أمراض النساء والتوليد قسم NURS

Programme Report

A- Basic Information

1- Programme Title: Community health nursing doctorate program report

2- Programme type:       Single           Double            Multiple      

3-Department(s): Community health nursing department

4-Co-ordinator: Assist.Prof.Dr. Amany Sobhy Sorour

5- External evaluator: Prof.Dr\ Zakia Toma , Prof.Dr\ Soheir Badr ElDin

6- Year of operation: 2012-2013

7- Academic year/ 2012-2013                          Semester/

B- Statistic

1-No. of students starting the programme.  3 students

2-Ratio of students attending the programme this year to those of lastYear:

Ratio:  3: 1

3-No. and percentage of students passing in each year/Level/Semester:

 No.: 3 students   Percent:100%

4-No. of students completing the programme and as a percentage of

    those who started: 100%

66.7

2

0

0

5-Grading: No. and percentage in each grade

Excellent:  No.            %                 Very Good: No.                      %            

Good :       No.               %                  Pass:  No.                  %

6-First destinations of graduates

Give percentages of the graduating cohort who have

i.  Proceeded to appropriate employment

ii  Proceeded to other employment

iii Undertaken postgraduate study

iv. Engaged in other types of activity

v.  Unknown first destination

Academic Standards

1- Achievement of programme intended learning outcomes

*                   Knowledge and Understanding

**                 Intellectual Skills

***               Professional and Practical Skills

****             General and Transferable Skills

1.      Commentary (quoting evaluations from external evaluator and other stakeholders)

Making update in programme objectives

2.  Achievement of programme aims

Commentary(quoting evaluations from external evaluator and other stakeholders)

The programe objectives were specific and measurable and totally achieved by the end of the programme

3. Assessment methods 

Commentary(quoting evaluations from external evaluator and other stakeholders)

Used  assessment methods were appropriate for ILOs

.

4. Student achievement

Commentary (quoting statistics from Section B and evaluations from external evaluator and other stakeholders)

100%of students passed the programme and 100%of them completed the programme and as a percentage of those who started.

Quality of Learning Opportunities

5. Quality of teaching and learning

Commentary on the quality of teaching and learning (quoting evaluations by stakeholders including students

…Totally achieved according to different teaching and learning methods ……

6. Effectiveness of student support systems

Commentary on both academic and pastoral/personal support for all students

Adequate

7. Learning resources

a. No. and ratio of faculty members and their assistants to students

Staff: 4

Students: 9

Ratio: 2:1

b. Matching of faculty member’s specialization to programme needs.

Adequate

c. Availability and adequacy of programme handbook

Adequate

d. Adequacy of library facilities.

Adequate

e. Adequacy of laboratories

Adequate

f. Adequacy of computer facilities

Inadequate

g. Adequacy of field/practical training resources

Adequate

h. Adequacy of any other programme needs

Adequate

8. Quality management

a. Availability of regular evaluation and revision system for the programme

Regular evaluation and revision system is available and continuously improved according to development and modification of programme courses from external evaluators.

b. Effectiveness of the system

Adequate

c. Effectiveness of Faculty and University laws and regulations for progression and completion

Adequate

d. Effectiveness of programme external evaluation system:

i- External evaluators

Adequate

ii- Students

                                 Not present

iii- Other stakeholders

Not present

e. Faculty response to student and external evaluations

Comments of xternal evaluator  were puted into consideration

9. Proposals for programme development

a. Programme structure (units/credit-hours)

Continous update in programe courses content based on community needs.

b. Courses, deletions and additions and modifications

Continuous modifications are done.

c. Staff development requirements

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

10. Progress of previous year’s action plan

Action Identified         Person Responsible Progress of action, state if completed                                  and any reasons for non-completion

Continous updates in     Head of Department and staff of         All modification

programme courses      community health nursing department        were done

contents based on                          

the analysis of questionnaires

11. Action plan

Action                                                   Person Responsible         Completion Date

Update scheduled programme

based on the needs and problems     Head of Department and staff of      2013-2014

   of the society                                 community health nursing

                                                                       department

Annex

Attach all course reports as annexes\